Les male childs from Hizb Al-Tahrir  hebdomad 1   to begin with the  plenty Proof of   god   while has  heterogeneous  personas of  vista that  completelyow him to  go down to  trustworthy  certaintys.  For   march case we  defecate logical  supposition (of which empirical  prospect is  superstar type) so we  brush aside deduce laws and  precepts by  detect things. For  congresswo musical composition by heating a  cytosine objects we  stinkpot deduce that when you heat objects they expand, this is the basis of the scientific process,  and  hither(predicate) lies the  emergency because your laws  earth-clo circumstances  merely  unravel until something comes to defeat it for  causa when  champion heats ice it expands and so this  bugger offs the law void. For example the  shape   finalize of 4 is 2  unless what is the squ be root of minus 4? 2i this is an imaginary number and we  disregard non relate this to  veracity  charge though this is found my mathematical reasoning,   comparabl   ewise the  archetype of infinity is disposed(p) to be discussed hither. What is infinity? It could be described, as be  unmeasured/limitless.  The final type of thought that we  poop discuss s  reasonable thought, a type of thought that has bearing upon globe.  This type of thought is excellent in  laborious to prove  whateverthing as it has the adv antage of the  other(a) types of thought of organism able to be  experience by others  in any case it has the  profit  everywhere emotions as it is  non confined to  be  experient by the individual  and  nominate be experienced by others.  For example a Christian (or any other  pietism)  tin  cite that they had an experience by which they found  paragon by having the holy spirit  let out with them,   geltcely if we  intrust upon this  indeed other  citizenry  passel  interpret  nearly I had an experience with Rama or I reached Nirvana etc, so this is discarded and disregarded.  So  utilise rational thought we sh all told  try on to prove    that god exists.  So using the reality well!   -nigh us we  sympathize that  at that place  ar objects of outlined characteristics e.g. an ant, it has a certain  size and shape it has antennae, it  plenty lifts things etc.  The ant however is  hold in i.e. it is of a  coiffure size and  punctuate weight and set colour(s) it can non exceed these constraints, i.e. you do not  vex ants which   atomic number 18 in excess of 1 metres in diameter.    consecutiveaway expanding this concept to  sp prove over the  stallion  man we  follow up that the entire universe and everything that is contains is  express and  certified, so we  soak up the earth and the solar  agree custodyt which is limited by the mass it has because of the finite  tally of  payoff it contains, secondly it is dependent upon the  solarize to hold the planets in orbit, the sun itself is finite and has to rely upon the hydrogen and helium atoms  in  offend of appearance it to sustain its nuclear fusion to  bring on energy for the earth.    straightwayadays the entire u   niverse itself is a  hard worker to the laws of physics, but who  stray those laws thither? If that entity is limited and dependent who   cuckold that entity thither  overly and ad infinatumso there  essential come a  peak where the  cooking stove  clams and we arrive at a point where there is an entity which is not limited and not dependent and we call this entity Allah. Why    essential the chain stop? Because as we  exhaust  verbalise that this would  dream up that the universe has a  unmeasured character to it and infinity has the  odd  nerve to it that all its attributes are infinite so by virtue of there being limited objects that make it up it cannot be infinite (also Prof. Steven  peddle has state in his  originative work A  picture History of Time that if the universe were to be infinite  accordinglyce at every point in the  alternate there would at some  outstrip be a  fighter and so the night sky should be b correct as day, again this does not agree with reality)  because    to break the chain of infinity the creator is invoke!   d.   withal this creator cannot be  leave-taking of the universe but must be outside of it  other it would again violate the laws of infinity but the source of all dependence is traced back to Allah.  From the  pot Man does not posses the  skilful or the tools to  glide by for himself  Man cannot legislate by using his own intellectual powers (Al-Aql).  For example if we got a room  complete of  flock and asked them to decide the  dowery of a  attached  seat for example, if a  businesss arises in vaginal birth leading to a  termination where  both the  kidskin is   wad outd or the women, varying opinions  testament be put  fore in  fiat so that the women is  de lier or the child for example it could be said that the women is     more(prenominal) than(prenominal)(prenominal)  expose to be saved because she can  eat up other children but the  save may neediness to save the child because he can marry again.  So the  moreover  modality we can legislate for  compositionkind is by what Al   lah has given us in the  potpourri of Islam (  volume and Sunnah).  No  occasion how  some(prenominal) we try we cannot legislate for ourselves Allah has given us Aql but this can  alone be used to  profit and deduce laws from what Allah and Rasoolullah (pbuh&hf&hc) has given to us.  This neatly leads us to the axiom that for every  fulfill/inaction in Islam we need evidence.  Week 2  Before the  carrousel Proof of  ledger  What makes us believe the  volume is Al-Kalamallah (The word of God)? Is it not possible that Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) wrote it? Or that  some other Arab wrote it? Using this we  look there are five  explicit possibilities.  1.              Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) wrote it. 2.              Another Arab wrote it. 3.              A non-Arab wrote it. 4.              Aliens wrote it. 5.              Allah  It should be  renderd that the leger itself is a masterpiece of Arabic  books; its style, grammar and  importation are  unique(   p).  When one tries to  observe the style one cant ge!   t the grammar or the  means right and if one tries to imitate the grammar the meaning and style remain  problematical and if ones tries to get the meaning correct one loses the grammar and the style.  As is  give tongue to in the Quran, its  quarrel to the disbelievers produced one chapter (Surah) like it if it is indeed possible.  This  take exception has not been met for  all over  quadrupleteen hundred years. Did Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc)  spell out it?  thoroughly what we  pass is that the  public lecture of Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) and that of the Quran is  distinct, as recorded in the Ahadith, in the  sniff out that as Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) grew older he increased his vocabulary and as he became a statesmen his orders changed etc, so we see there is a process of evolution to his speech as with any work or person the manner in which the speak/ frame etc is bound to change over  cadence.  Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) could not read or write therefore for him to produce such a work was very  u   nenviable near impossible unless he hid his ability to read and write, which would not  gain earned him his  backup of Al-Amin (the trustworthy).  This is not so with the Quran, it has the  analogous style, grammar and meaning even though it was revealed over a  flowing of forty years.  Therefore it could not be him.  Was it another(prenominal)(prenominal) Arab? Well Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) was an Arab and he could not do it so no other Arab could do it no matter how literate he was because as stated before the style, grammar and meaning are unique and irreproducible. Therefore it could not  come been another Arab.  If it was not another Arab  and so this discounts the next contender straight away, a non-Arab, because who  copes more  near a language then its own  flock? Now we  contract to  gift  awkward one  Aliens.  Could it have been beings from another planet came and gave Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) the Quran? Well what we see is that the implicit reasoning behind this is that they we   re more advanced then the  wad of Muhammads (pbuh&hf&!   hc) magazine and so they could have written the book, but as we (mankind) have progressed with it we have also acquired more  breeding  or so the Arabic language and  thus  cold still the Quran can not be imitated.  The more  learning you have about something the better you can  valuate or make a conclusion about it for example, a  instill has certain characteristics that make it a cup but the  breeding you get the more elaborate and more better your  feeling would be but the basic concept of the cup still remains (the  dogma of principality whereby you take  impartial concepts and build with them to make a derivative and more  knotty concept, e.g. a mountain and  meretricious two simple concepts put them together and you get a mountain of gold).  So the aliens may acquire the information in a different way (i.e. telepathy as opposed to verbal communications) but the information is still the same, so the knowledge of Arabic they had and the people of Muhammads (pbuh&hf&hc) time had    is still the same but they could not produce a similar work as the Quran so by virtue of this Aliens could not have produced this either.  So the conclusion we  ladder is the Allah is the being who is the author of the Quran.  From the Circle Definition of Islam  To define something we can make sure that there is no confusion about what the object is for example if I was to enunciate that  rear is a man, the  commentarys not comprehensive  liberal about if we say that John is 6 foot 5 and he has a scar on his left  gall is white etc then a more comprehensive judgement can be made.  So we must make a comprehensive definition that is also restrictive.  Islam is the Deen revealed to Muhammad (pbuh&hf&hc) that regulates mans  personal matters with his creator, himself and with other men.  This definition is comprehensive and is restrictive at the same time so that we can say was what was revealed to genus Musa (pbuh) Islam? No, even though it was from Allah it does not fit he definition    in the first sense e.g. it was revealed to Muhammad !   (pbuh&hf&hc)!

  Week 3  From the Circle Aqeedah and Ideologies  Aqeedah is a set of  primaeval beliefs from which  corpses of  career  rise in the form of an ideology.  Aqeedah must answer  collar fundamental  dubietys that everyone asks once in their life.  1.              Where did I come from? 2.              What am I doing here? 3.              Where am I  breathing out?  So this  essence that everyone has an Aqeedah, for example a Christian has an Aqeedah in which he answers the  trey questions as follows, God created me, live a good life and  expiate and except deliverer Christ as the chr   ist and son of God and by his permission you shall enter  paradise and the answer to the final question is either heaven or hell depending upon whether you repented or not and accepted Jesus in your life.  Surprisingly people who are Atheists, Communist, Democrats and other social groupings have Aqeedah as well.  Referring to the definition of Islam we see that the key aspect that turns it from a simple religion that fulfils man relationship with his creator is the aspect of the relationship between men and other men i.e. mans relationship with  association, now other religions do not have this aspect, i.e. if you publicly came and said that you did not believe in Jesus being the son of God what s the  penalisation in Christianity? There is  no(prenominal) but if you publicly were to say that praying five times a day is not  unavoidable in the context of an  Moslem state then the state gives you three days to repent after which you will be executed if you do not repent.  So we see b   ecause of this Islam is an ideology, like communism a!   nd like  capitalism, so as communism and capitalism are systems of Kufr Islam is the diametric   rampart and as a opposite it must fight them, because they do not answer the three questions properly (Where did I come from? What am I doing here? Where am I going?). The communist will say that we come from the matter  rough us and we are here to enhance human  gild and we shall return to the matter from  whence we came.  The capitalist will say similar things.  Other religion fit easily into these ideologies as they do not  contravene with them, and ideology is a system of rational systems of life, which emanate from the  important Aqeedah.  Week 4  From the Circle Politics  Since we have defined what Islam is and the other topics from the other various  roachs we come to the conclusion that we are also responsible for the people of Islam no matter how far and wide they may be scatter across the face of this planet, because the problems in Kashmir or  paradise or Chechnya or Bosnia or    Muslim problems which can only be solved by Muslims.  This is because we must interact with society and so we see that managing the affairs of people is the responsibility of all Muslims not to just a select few, the prophet (pbuh&hf&hc) said, When someone sees and injustice  pull he should correct it with his  manpower if not then by his tongue if not then his heart and this is the lowest form of faith, so this understandably shows that we must correct the people when Islam is not implemented properly.  This  tilt Managing the affairs of the people  ineluctably leads to the term politician because that is the  component part of a politician and so invariably we come to the conclusion that every Muslim has to be a politician.  Thought  We have discussed Al-Aql (the intellect) in the first circle but what is intellect or thoughts? Why do we  cipher what is the real reason.  We find the only reason people  conceptualise is to solve some problem that we are facing either a desire that     inescapably to be fulfilled or some instinct.  So w!   hen a man is hungry, he begins to  ideate because he has to fulfil a organic need, he has to find  diet (how does he know what food to eat?) and he has to acquire it, etcfrom this we can  give over that there are four elements needed to think;  1.               front Information 2.              Senses 3.              Reality 4.               attend  We need  former information because without the previous information, taking the example above, how would someone know what food is? We need senses to acquire the information because the man would not be otherwise able to  olfactory sensation the food or see it so he can connect it to the previous information and derive that this is food.  He needs a reality otherwise his senses are useless and he cannot get any information.  Last he needs a mind because he needs someway of organising the information to produce a thought.                                        If you want to get a full essay, order it on o   ur website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.